(Ontario High Court) Fraser J said: ‘I am of opinion that in this jurisdiction a party to a correspondence within the ‘without prejudice’ privilege is, generally speaking, protected from being required to disclose it on discovery or at trial in proceedings by or against the third party.’
Citations:
[1968] 1 DR 642
Jurisdiction:
Canada
Cited by:
Appeal from – I Waxman and Sons Ltd v Texaco Canada Ltd 2-Jan-1968
(Court of Appeal of Ontario) The court approved the decision below. . .
Cited – Rush and Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and Another HL 1988
Use of ‘Without Prejudice Save as to Costs”
A sub-contractor sought payment from the appellants under a construction contract for additional expenses incurred through disruption and delay. The appellants said they were liable to pay the costs, and were entitled to re-imbursement from the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 30 November 2022; Ref: scu.253701