Hutten-Czapska v Poland: ECHR 22 Feb 2005

ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of P1-1; Just satisfaction reserved; Costs and expenses partial award.

Sir Nicolas Bratza, P
35014/97, [2005] ECHR 119
Worldlii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedHutten-Czapska v Poland ECHR 28-Apr-2008
. .
See AlsoHutten-Czapska v Poland ECHR 19-Jun-2006
Grand Chamber. The court considered the need for establishing a fair balance in cases under A1P1: ‘Not only must an interference with the right of property pursue, on the facts as well as in principle, a ‘legitimate aim’ in the ‘general interest’, . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 04 January 2022; Ref: scu.230656