The defendant had been found to be in breach of copyright, and of misuse of private information. The court now considered the form of orders required to complete the judgment.
Held: The statement to be published by the defendant was not to be in the same font-size as the story which was being corrected. The statement had many more words than the story.
Judges:
Warby J
Citations:
[2021] EWHC 669 (Ch)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc CA 18-Oct-2012
In a registered design claim, the line drawings included one or two small features (an opening catch and a rim around the edge), and the natural implication was that no other ornamentation was intended, a view supported by the fact that the . .
Cited – Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Ltd CA 27-Jun-2018
Whether valid grant of leave to appeal on retirement of judge. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Media
Updated: 08 October 2022; Ref: scu.659922