Site icon swarb.co.uk

Horsfall v Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation: EAT 24 Nov 2011

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity
While the Employment Judge made an unguarded comment immediately before the Claimant’s cross-examination, it did not in the context of the proceedings as a whole give rise to apparent bias. 35 grounds of appeal on perversity, and reasons challenges, were dismissed.

Judges:

McMullen QC J

Citations:

[2011] UKEAT 0292 – 11 – 2411

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 01 November 2022; Ref: scu.460381

Exit mobile version