Site icon swarb.co.uk

Horlock v Smith Horlock R Bennett Horlock v Priestley Priestley I: Horlock Yarde; Burford Yarde v Priestley: 4 May 1837

If a client, having paid his solicitor’s bill of costs, without pressure or undue influence, wishes afterwards to have it taxed, he must state in his petition, and prove by evidence, that the bill contains such grossly improper charges as furnish evidence of fraud; and the petition must point out the particular items to which that description applies, and those items must be proved by evidence to answer the description.
[1837] EngR 697, (1837) 2 My and Cr 495, (1837) 40 ER 728
Commonlii
England and Wales

Updated: 09 June 2021; Ref: scu.313814 br>

Exit mobile version