Site icon swarb.co.uk

Hirji Mulji v Cheong Yue Steamship Co Ltd: 1926

Lord Sumner considered the doctrine of frustration, formulating it as a ‘device by which the rules as to absolute contracts are reconciled with a special exception which justice demands.’

Judges:

Lord Sumner

Citations:

[1926] AC 497

Cited by:

CitedNational Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd HL 11-Dec-1980
No Frustration of Lease through loss of access
The tenant’s access to the premises was closed by the local authority because it passed by a derelict and dangerous building. The tenant argued that its tenancy was frustrated.
Held: The lease was not frustrated. The lease had a term of ten . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 14 May 2022; Ref: scu.259068

Exit mobile version