Site icon swarb.co.uk

Halil and Another v Davidson: HL 3 Jul 1980

The appellants, Turkish Cypriots, arrived on visitor permits, but after extensions, were given notice that their leave to stay would come to an end.
Held: The appeal failed. The notice given was in the form disapproved in Suthendram, but the adjudicator had been correct to refuse jurisdiction.

Judges:

Lord Wilberforce, Viscount Dilhorne, Lord Salmon, Lord Fraser of Tullybelton, Lord Russell of Killowen

Citations:

[1980] UKHL 13, [1979-80] Imm AR 164

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedSuthendran v Immigration Appeal Tribunal HL 1977
The Appellant had been given leave under section 3(1)(b) of the 1971 Act to enter and remain in the United Kingdom for 12 months. Before it expired, he applied for his leave to be varied by way of extension under section 3(3)(a) of the Act. The . .
AppliedRegina v Immigration Appeal Adjudicator, ex parte Bhanji CA 4-Apr-1977
The appellant had been issued with a form stating when his leave to stay would expire.
Held: The ‘time to pack up’ leave given by form APP101 could not be taken as a leave de novo but only as a permission to remain as an indulgence, and not a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.263819

Exit mobile version