Grey v Grey: CA 31 Dec 2009

After bitterly fought ancillary relief proceedings, the husband sought amendment of the order for periodical payments saying that the wife had been in a relationship with another man. She replied that she was not cohabiting and that therefore the order was correct.

Judges:

Thorpe, Wall, Patten LJJ

Citations:

[2010] 2 FLR 795, [2010] Fam Law 440, [2010] 1 FCR 394, [2009] EWCA Civ 1424

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedKimber v Kimber FD 2001
HHJ Tyrer set out a series of considerations as to whether a couple could be said to be cohabiting. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Family

Updated: 14 August 2022; Ref: scu.402500