Site icon swarb.co.uk

Goldman v Hesper: 1988

The court has power in costs proceedings to order the receiving party to disclose such documents, orginally to the court, as are necessary to make its decision.
Held: It would be rare to exercise this discretion.

Citations:

[1988] 1 WLR 1238

Statutes:

Rules of the Supreme Court Order 62, rule 29

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedHollins v Russell etc CA 22-May-2003
Six appeals concerned a number of aspects of the new Conditional Fee Agreement.
Held: It should be normal for a CFA, redacted as necessary, to be disclosed for costs proceedings where a success fee is claimed. If a party seeks to rely on the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 01 December 2022; Ref: scu.182518

Exit mobile version