In each of two cases, the claimant sued in copyright alleging that the defendant had made available copies of a film, to which it held the rights, for download from the internet.
Held: In view of the similarities in the case with the Media Cat litigation, it was appropriate to adjourn and hold a hearing with both parties present.
Judges:
Birss QC J
Citations:
[2011] EWPCC 27
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Media CAT Ltd v Adams and Others PCC 8-Feb-2011
The claimants had begun copyright infringement proceedings claiming that they represented the rights holders in pornographic films said to have been file shared by the defendants. Faced with insuperable difficulties, they purported to withdraw the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice
Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.444660