Site icon swarb.co.uk

Godwin v Francis: 1870

The court was asked as to the effect of a note or memorandum in the form of instructions to a telegraph company signed by the party to be charged on whose behalf the telegram concerned was sent.
Held: Bovill CJ said: ‘the mere telegram written out and signed in the way indicated by the telegram clerk, if done with the authority of the vendors, would have been a sufficient signature’.

Judges:

Bovill CJ

Citations:

(1870) LR 5 CP 295

Statutes:

Staute of Frauds 1677 9

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

DistinguishedMehta v J Pereira Fernandes SA ChD 7-Apr-2006
The parties were in dispute. The now respondent threatened winding up. The appellant had someone in his company send an email requesting an adjournment and apparently giving a personal guarantee to a certain amount. The application was adjourned, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.241715

Exit mobile version