Benefits payable in maternity leave must make allowance for a pay increase which applied to other workers whilst employee on leave.
Citations:
Times 22-Feb-1996, [1996] ECR 1-475, C-342/93, [1996] ICR 499, [1996] EUECJ C-342/93
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – M K Alabaster v Woolwich Plc, the Secretary of State for Social Security EAT 7-Apr-2000
The regulations did not properly implement the decision of the European Court which they intended to reflect. When a woman was on maternity leave, and there was a salary award, she should have been entitled to the benefit of that award whether or . .
Cited – Alabaster v Woolwich Plc, Secretary of State for Social Security CA 26-Feb-2002
The applicant had left on maternity leave. Before leaving, her salary had been increased, but the increase was not back-dated to any part of the period over which the regulations required her average earnings to be calculated for statutory maternity . .
Cited – Alabaster v Barclays Bank Plc and Another CA 3-May-2005
The claimant sought increased maternity pay. Before beginning her maternity leave she had been awarded a pay increase, but it was not backdated so as to affect the period upon which the calculation of her average pay was based. The court made a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, European, European
Updated: 03 June 2022; Ref: scu.161169