Games v University of Kent: EAT 14 Jul 2014

EAT Age Discrimination – The Employment Tribunal erred in law in its approach to the question of ‘particular disadvantage’ for the purposes of section 19(2)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 and did not give Meek compliant reasons for its conclusion on the question whether the PCP which the Respondent applied was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim for the purposes of section 19(2)(d). Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Homer [2012] ICR 704 applied.

David Richardson HHJ
[2014] UKEAT 0524 – 13 – 1407
Equality Act 2010 19(2)(b)
England and Wales

Discrimination, Employment

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.539291