Site icon swarb.co.uk

Gahramanov v Azerbaijan: ECHR 15 Oct 2013

(Admissibility) The applicant was prevented for (on his own case) some four hours from leaving, after being stopped at an airport.
Held: The complaint was inadmissible on the ground that it had not been shown that he had been obliged to remain any longer than was necessary to ascertain his status.

Citations:

26291/06

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedBeghal v Director of Public Prosecutions SC 22-Jul-2015
Questions on Entry must be answered
B was questioned at an airport under Schedule 7 to the 2000 Act, and required to answer questions asked by appropriate officers for the purpose set out. She refused to answer and was convicted of that refusal , contrary to paragraph 18 of that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 09 May 2022; Ref: scu.590445

Exit mobile version