Frost and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others: CA 31 Oct 1996

The distinction normally made between primary and secondary victims claiming damages for shock in witnessing a terrible event does not apply to employees who were obliged by their contract to be present.
Times 06-Nov-1996, [1996] EWHC CA 173
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromFrost and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire QBD 3-Jul-1995
Trained rescuers have to be assumed to have a higher distress threshold because of their training and experience, and if a claim for psychiatric injury is to be made out, they must show some exceptional and particular situation to justify the claim. . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromWhite, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others HL 3-Dec-1998
No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone
The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy.
Held: The general rules restricting the recovery of damages for pure psychiatric harm applied to the . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 14 April 2021; Ref: scu.80695