Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Flourez v Council (Rec 1988,P 6393) (Order): ECJ 7 Dec 1988

Citations:

C-138/88, [1988] EUECJ C-138/88

Links:

European

Updated: 23 May 2022; Ref: scu.134876

Posted on May 23, 2022May 23, 2022 by dlsPosted in European

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Solvay v Commission: ECJ 18 Oct 1989

Next Next post: MC v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea: CA 7 Mar 2002

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

AKB and Another v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 15 Nov 2005
RM Broudie and Co v The Lord Chancellor: SCCO 17 May 2000
Northumbrian Water Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc: TCC 28 Oct 2005
Valentine v Alan and others: SCCO 29 Jul 2003
Offer-Hoar, Technotrade Ltd and others v Larkstore Ltd, Bess Ltd: TCC 2 Dec 2005
Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd: SCCO 28 Nov 2002
Mariotti v Government of Italy and others: Admn 2 Dec 2005
Paduraru v Romania: ECHR 1 Dec 2005
Andre Agassi v S Robinson (H M Inspector of Taxes) (No 2): CA 2 Dec 2005
Raymond, Regina (on the Application Of) v London Borough of Ealing: CA 16 Nov 2005
Summit Property Ltd v Pitmans (A Firm): SCCO 18 Nov 2001
Bufton v Hill: SCCO 7 May 2002
Morris v The Lord Chancellor: SCCO 4 Feb 2000
Holland and Another v PKF (A Firm) and others: SCCO 11 Oct 2004
Giambrone and others v JMC Holidays: SCCO 22 Mar 2002
Kiam v MGN Ltd: CA 6 Feb 2002
Giambrone v JMC Holidays Ltd (No.2): SCCO 20 Dec 2002
Luxmyranthan v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 16 Nov 2005
Marley (UK) Ltd v Alcock: CA 11 Nov 2005
Upton v National Westminster Bank Plc and others: CA 14 Nov 2005
Dehaghani v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland: NIIT 31 Aug 2005
Montgomery v Cafe Creme Restaurant Ltd and others: NIIT 10 Jun 2005
O’Kane v Northland Early Years Centre Ltd and Another: NIIT 4 May 2005
McMahon v Kulus and others: NIIT 4 May 2005
Harkin v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: NIIT 9 May 2005
Hoy v Nash and Another: NIIT 13 Apr 2005
Shestopalova and Others v Russia: ECHR 17 Nov 2005
Vasilyeva v Russia: ECHR 17 Nov 2005
Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: SCIT 25 Oct 2005
A (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 1 Dec 2005
Thakerar v Lynch Hall and Hornby (a Firm): ChD 21 Oct 2005
Vanlangendonck v Commission (Staff Regulations): ECFI 30 Nov 2005
Allmark v Ervel Curt Burnham, Distinct Services Ltd: ChD 30 Nov 2005
Almdudler-Limonade v OHMI (Forme D’Une Bouteille De Limonade): ECFI 30 Nov 2005
BP Plc v AON Limited, Aon Risk Services of Texas Inc: ComC 16 Nov 2005
Autosalone Ispra v Commission (EAEC): ECFI 30 Nov 2005
Smallwood v Revenue and Customs: SCIT 3 Nov 2005
London Diocesan Fund and others v Avonridge Property Company Ltd and Phithwa: HL 1 Dec 2005
Hammond, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 1 Dec 2005
AWG Group Ltd and Another v Morrison and Another: ChD 1 Dec 2005
Shukla v Rajpuri: NIIT 30 Mar 2005
Loans.Co.UK Ltd v Abbeyway Contracts Ltd and Another: Nom 18 Feb 2004
Corporate Events Ltd v Oliis Ltd: Nom 20 Feb 2004
Powell v Turner: Nom 20 Jan 2004
Bernard, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another: Admn 8 Mar 2005
Jackson, Regina (on the Application Of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 26 Nov 2004
Excel Polymers Ltd v Achillesmark Ltd: QBD 28 Jul 2005
Magagnin v Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police: EAT 9 Mar 2005
Gate Gourmet London Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union and others: QBD 21 Aug 2005
Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs v Stork: QBD 3 Aug 2005

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.