Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Fletcher v Rushcliffe Borough Council: EAT 7 Apr 2005

EAT Disability Discrimination – Disability.

Judges:

Mr Recorder Luba

Citations:

[2005] UKEAT 0556 – 04 – 0704, UKEAT/0556/04

Links:

Bailii, EAT

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 19 May 2022; Ref: scu.229903

Posted on May 19, 2022May 19, 2022 by dlsPosted in Discrimination, EmploymentTagged Discrimination, Employment

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Diezler and Others v Economic and Social Committee of the European Communities: ECJ 27 Oct 1987
Next Next post: Barclays Bank Plc v Kapur and others: EAT 3 Dec 1992

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (359)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,503)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (201)
  • Commercial (1,422)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,023)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,169)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (717)
  • Contract (6,112)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,547)
  • Crime (8,397)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,313)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,425)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,626)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,719)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,881)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,012)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,927)
  • Housing (1,991)
  • Human Rights (19,597)
  • Immigration (56,350)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,617)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,043)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (858)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,647)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,956)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,062)
  • Litigation Practice (7,050)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,754)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,899)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,740)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,756)
  • Transport (2,042)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Paget, Regina v: CACD 15 Mar 2018
  • Box, Regina v: CACD 15 Mar 2018
  • Tyrrel Investments Inc v The Lessees of Alum Chine House: FTTPC 6 Mar 2017
  • Dalby v R G Riversions Property Management Limited (Northern : Section 27A): FTTPC 25 May 2018
  • See Application v Berkeley Seventy-Seven Limited (London : Section 27A): FTTPC 21 Jan 2018
  • Wilkinson v Places for People Homes Limited (Northern : Section 27A Section 20C): FTTPC 6 Aug 2018
  • Contour Property Services Limited v All The Long Leaseholders of The Various Apartments As Listed In The Annex (Northern : Section 27A): FTTPC 7 Aug 2018
  • Curry v Price (Southern : Service Charges): FTTPC 11 Jul 2018
  • Wheeldon Brothers Waste Ltd v Millennium Insurance Company Ltd: CA 18 Oct 2018
  • Hayre v Sajdak (Fraud, Forgery, Duress and Undue Influence : Evidence): FTTPC 31 Jul 2018
  • Carroll, Carroll v Marshall, Swallow Barn Properties Limited (Easements and Profits A Prendre : Prescription, Extent of Right Acquired): FTTPC 4 Jul 2018
  • Southern Land Securities C/0 Together Property Management Ltd v The Leaseholders (London : Section 20ZA): FTTPC 18 Jun 2018
  • See Application v Tortington Manor Management Company Limited (Southern : Determination of Service Charges): FTTPC 20 Jun 2018
  • Yates v Persons Unknown (London : Section 50/51): FTTPC 30 May 2018
  • Norseman Holdings Ltd v Warwick Court (Harold Hill) Management Ltd (London : Liability To Pay Service and Administration Charges): FTTPC 21 Jun 2018
  • Cardtronics Europe Ltd and Others v Syke and Others (Valuation Officers): CA 9 Nov 2018
  • Alexander v Willow Court Management Company (1985) Limited: CA 1 Nov 2018
  • Astex Therapeutics Ltd v Astrazeneca Ab: CA 6 Nov 2018
  • London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Petrou and Mikelis (London : Variation of A Lease By A Party To The Lease): FTTPC 24 May 2018
  • Court Management Limited v The Lessees (Southern : To Dispense With The Requirement To Consult Lessees About Major Works): FTTPC 16 Jul 2018
  • Vasilyeva v Russia: ECHR 5 Apr 2016
  • McCann, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 8 Jan 2016
  • – v – (Northern : Section 88): FTTPC 15 Oct 2013
  • – v – (Northern : Section 27A Section 20C): FTTPC 26 Nov 2013
  • – v – (London : Dispensation With Consultation Requirements): FTTPC 11 Nov 2013
  • – v – (London : Paragraph 5 of Schedule 11): FTTPC 17 Dec 2013
  • – v – (Northern : Section 27A Section 20C): FTTPC 18 Nov 2013
  • – v – (Southern : Part 6 of The Tribunal Procedure (First Tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 – Rule 55 – Application for Permission To Appeal): FTTPC 12 Oct 2013
  • Hattenstone Investments Limited v Crook, Miller, Pegg (Southern : Liability To Pay Service Charges): FTTPC 22 Jan 2018
  • – v – (London : Liabilty To Pay Service Charge): FTTPC 16 Dec 2013
  • Ribbans v Tingdene (Southern : Miscellaneous): FTTPC 22 Jan 2018
  • – v – (London : Liability To Pay Service Charges Administration Charges? Limitation of Costs of Proceedings): FTTPC 12 Nov 2013
  • – v – (Northern : Section 168,): FTTPC 22 Nov 2013
  • Creulty Free International v Information Commssioner: FTTGRC 25 Jan 2016
  • Kirkham v The Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 25 Jan 2016
  • Rights and Accountability In Development v The Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 25 Jan 2016
  • Home Office v Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 14 Jan 2016
  • Downs v Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 11 Jan 2016
  • Shevlin v The Information Commissioner: FTTGRC 25 Jan 2016
  • Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis v DSD and Another: SC 21 Feb 2018
  • Lynch, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 11 Jan 2016
  • Clarke, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 13 Jan 2016
  • 21 Glebelands – Harlow : Midland : Birmingham: LVT 14 Aug 2015
  • 21-22 Forest Lane – Newham : London: LVT 20 Aug 2015
  • 2 Abinger House 205 – 211 London Road – Merton : London: LVT 10 Aug 2015
  • Boyle, Re Judicial Review: QBNI 8 Jan 2016
  • 247 Holmesdale Road – Croydon : London: LVT 3 Aug 2015
  • 26 Montague Avenue – Lewisham : London: LVT 19 Aug 2015
  • 15 Firbank Close – Enfield : London: LVT 20 Aug 2015
  • Flat 1 and 3 12 Crossbeck Road – Bradford : Northern : Manchester (Forfeiture): LVT 21 Jul 2015

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.