Finecard International Ltd (T/A the Ninja Corporation) v Urquhart Dyke and Lord (A Firm) and Another: ChD 10 Nov 2005

The defendants sought an interim ruling that they were not the cause of the claimant’s losses. They had acted as patent agents to license to exploit the claimant’s patent in the UK. They alleged that the failure to complete the registration of the patent in a timely fashion meant that they had been unable to recover losses despite the licence.


Peter Smith J


[2005] EWHC 2481 (Ch)




England and Wales


CitedCook v Swinfen 1966
. .
CitedVision Golf v Weightmans (a Firm) ChD 26-Jul-2005
The defendant solicitors were joint tortfeasors, having failed to make an application to court in a timely fashion, when it might have succeeded. It defended the claim saying that had the claimant issued proceedings against a second firm that firm . .
CitedGovernors of the Hospital of Sick Children v McLaughlin and Harvey plc 1987
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property, Licensing

Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.234713