Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 10; No separate issue under Art. 9; No violation of Art. 14; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings
29032/95, [2011] ECHR 604
Bailii
Human Rights
Citing:
see Also – Feldek v Slovakia ECHR 12-Jul-2001
Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 10; No separate issue under Art. 9; No violation of Art. 14; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and . .
Cited by:
Cited – Steel and Morris v United Kingdom ECHR 15-Feb-2005
The applicants had been sued in defamation by McDonalds. They had no resources, and English law precluded legal aid for such cases. The trial was the longest in English legal history. They complained that the non-availablility of legal aid infringed . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 25 August 2021; Ref: scu.164828 br>