Site icon swarb.co.uk

Farquharson (Removal – Proof of Conduct) Jamaica: UTIAC 8 Apr 2013

UTIAC (1) Where the respondent relies on allegations of conduct in proceedings for removal, the same principles apply as to proof of conduct and the assessment of risk to the public, as in deportation cases: Bah [2012] UKUT 196 (IAC) etc applicable.
(2) A criminal charge that has not resulted in a conviction is not a criminal record; but the acts that led to the charge may be established as conduct.
(3) If the respondent seeks to establish the conduct by reference to the contents of police CRIS reports, the relevant documents should be produced, rather than a bare witness statement referring to them.
(4) The material relied on must be supplied to the appellant in good time to prepare for the appeal.
(5) The judge has a duty to ensure a fair hearing is obtained by affording the appellant sufficient time to study the documents and respond.
(6) Where the appellant is in detention and faces a serious allegation of conduct, it is in the interests of justice that legal aid is made available.

Blake J, Lane UTJ, Sir Jeffrey James
[2013] UKUT 146 (IAC)
Bailii
England and Wales

Immigration

Updated: 05 January 2022; Ref: scu.472151

Exit mobile version