The defendant appealed from his convictions for possession and dissemination of terrorist related publications, saying that the judge should not have admitted evidence of the possession by named terrorist offenders of material similar or identical to that allegedly disseminated by the appellant, for the purpose of considering whether the material comprised ‘a terrorist publication’
Judges:
Pitchford LJ, Kenneth Parker J, Gilbet QC HHJ
Citations:
[2012] EWCA Crim 2820, [2013] WLR(D) 1, [2013] 1 WLR 2615, [2013] 1 Cr App R 29
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Wang Yam, Regina (on The Application of) v Central Criminal Court and Another SC 16-Dec-2015
The appellant was to apply to the ECHR challenge the fairness of his trial because it was held partially in camera. The UK resisted this application. The appellant sought to be permitted in his response to disclose and refer to contents of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Practice, Criminal Evidence
Updated: 22 October 2022; Ref: scu.467636