Site icon swarb.co.uk

F and C Asset Management Plc and others v Switalski: EAT 23 May 2008

EAT Sex Discrimination – Comparison – Burden of proof
Practice and Procedure – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Direct sex discrimination – less favourable treatment – comparative exercise – Respondents’ explanation – adequacy of reasons.

Citations:

[2008] UKEAT 0080 – 08 – 2305

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

CitedDr Anya v University of Oxford and Another CA 22-Mar-2001
Discrimination – History of interactions relevant
When a tribunal considered whether the motive for an act was discriminatory, it should look not just at the act, but should make allowance for earlier acts which might throw more light on the act in question. The Tribunal should assess the totality . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromF and C Asset Management Plc and others v Switalski CA 20-Oct-2008
. .
See AlsoF and C Asset Management Plc and others v Switalski EAT 9-Dec-2008
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Review
UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal
SEX DISCRIMINATION: Direct
Two appeals in respect of two matters heard together by the Employment Tribunal:
(i) . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268112

Exit mobile version