Site icon swarb.co.uk

Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton: EAT 30 Jan 1998

When considering whether an unfair dismissal claimant was an employee, the tribunal should first establish as a fact the terms of the agreement and then consider whether any of the terms were inherently inconsistent with the existence of a contract of employment in order to determine whether the contract was a contract of service or a contract for services.
Peter Clarke J
[1998] UKEAT 1261 – 97 – 3001, [1999] IRLR 367
Bailii
Employment Rights Act 1996 1
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedAutoclenz Ltd v Belcher and Others CA 13-Oct-2009
Car Valeters contracts misdescribed their Duties
The claimants worked cleaning cars for the appellants. They said that as workers they were entitled to holiday pay. The appellant said they were self-employed.
Held: The contract purported to give rights which were not genuine, and the . .
CitedEmerging Markets Partnership (Europe) Ltd v Bachnak CA 19-Dec-2003
The claimant asserted unfair dismissal. The company denied that he was an employee. The company now appealed against the decision of the EAT to grant the claimant’s appeal. The claimant had been an employee, but the arrangement had been varied so . .
Appeal fromExpress and Echo Publications Limited v Tanton CA 11-Mar-1999
A contract for services, which required the contractor to provide an alternate worker in case of sickness, could not be a contract of employment. Such a clause could not be said to require the services to be provided personally.
Mr Tanton . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 27 July 2021; Ref: scu.206027 br>

Exit mobile version