Site icon swarb.co.uk

Eric Michael Garston; Alan Kilsha Toulson; Paul Denzil Nicholas and Charles Edward Cameron Gardner v Scottish Widows Fund and Life Assurance Society: CA 25 Jun 1998

References: [1998] EWCA Civ 1091
Links: Bailii
The lease demised property ‘from the 24th day of June 1985 for a term of twenty years’ with a break clause requiring six month’s notice. The break notice was calculated from the anniversary of the lease, not the anniversary of the term. At first instance, the lease was held not to have been validly terminated.
Held: The notice would have been read as indicating a desire to break the lease on the effective date, and the error did not operate to defeat it. One of the main purposes of Part II of the 1954 Act is to enable business tenants, where there is no good reason for their eviction, to continue in occupation after the expiration of their contractual tenancies. It is not a purpose of the Act to enable a business tenant who has chosen to determine his contractual tenancy to continue in occupation on terms different from those of that tenancy.
Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 26(2)
This case cites:

Exit mobile version