Site icon swarb.co.uk

Egmez v Cyprus: ECHR 21 Dec 2000

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 3; No violation of Art. 5-1; No violation of Art. 5-2; No violation of Art. 5-3; No violation of Art. 5-4; Violation of Art. 13; No separate issue under Art. 6-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings.
30873/96, [2000] ECHR 681
Worldlii, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedHuman Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland : Abortion) SC 7-Jun-2018
The Commission challenged the compatibility of the NI law relating to banning nearly all abortions with Human Rights Law. It now challenged a decision that it did not have standing to bring the case.
Held: (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 30 July 2021; Ref: scu.166010 br>

Exit mobile version