E. Friz GmbH v Carsten von der Heyden (Environment And Consumers): ECJ 15 Apr 2010

ECJ Consumer protection – Contracts negotiated away from business premises Scope of Directive 85/577/EEC – Entry into a closed-end real property fund established in the form of a partnership – Cancellation.
‘ . . art.5 (2) of the Directive provides that notification by the consumer of the renunciation of the effects of his undertaking has the effect of releasing him from any obligations under the cancelled contract.
It follows that, if the consumer has been properly informed of his right of renunciation, he may be released from his contractual obligations by exercising his right of renunciation within the period provided for in art.5(1) of the Directive, in accordance with the procedure laid down by national law.
On the other hand, as the Court has already held, where he did not receive that information, that period of not less than seven days does not start to run, so that the consumer can exercise his right of renunciation under art.5 (1) of the Directive at any time . . ‘

Citations:

C-215/08, [2010] EUECJ C-215/08, [2010] 3 CMLR 23

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 85/577/EEC

Citing:

CitedHeininger v Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG ECJ 13-Dec-2001
ECJ Consumer protection – Doorstep selling – Right of cancellation – Agreement to grant credit secured by charge on immovable property. . .

Cited by:

CitedRobertson v Swift SC 9-Sep-2014
Notice Absence did not Remove Right to Cancel
The defendant had contracted to arrange the removal of the claimant’s household goods on moving house. The claimant cancelled the contract, made at his housel, but refused to pay the cancellation fee, saying that the contract not having been made at . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Consumer

Updated: 17 August 2022; Ref: scu.408531