Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Dzhavadov v Russia: ECHR 8 Nov 2016

25071/07 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Third Section Committee)), [2016] ECHR 967
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights

Human Rights

Updated: 25 January 2022; Ref: scu.570994

Posted on January 25, 2022January 25, 2022 by dlsPosted in Human RightsTagged Human Rights

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd: QBD 4 Nov 2016
Next Next post: Regulus Ship Services Pte Ltd v Lundin Services Bv and Another: ComC 27 Oct 2016

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,520)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (316)
  • Commercial (1,423)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,025)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,172)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (838)
  • Contract (6,114)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,550)
  • Crime (8,398)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,315)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,837)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,630)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,722)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,954)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (2,003)
  • Human Rights (19,659)
  • Immigration (56,354)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,624)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,044)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (1,771)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,657)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,064)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,758)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,907)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,759)
  • Transport (2,049)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Regina v Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Committee Ex Parte B: CA 10 Mar 1995
  • O’Byrne v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Another: CA 17 Apr 2001
  • Regina v Chester and North Wales Legal Aid Area Office Ex Parte Floods of Queensbury Ltd: QBD 7 Nov 1997
  • Regina v Campbell (James Alexander): CACD 18 Jul 1996
  • Regina v Campbell: CACD 14 Jul 1994
  • Regina v Brent London Borough Council Ex Parte Awua: HL 6 Jul 1995
  • Regina (Wardle) v Leeds Crown Court: HL 24 May 2001
  • Regina (Tshikangu) v Newham London Borough Council: QBD 15 Feb 2001
  • Regina (S) v Swindon Borough Council and Another: QBD 27 Jun 2001
  • Regina (Pearson Martinez and Hirst) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others; Hirst v Attorney-General: QBD 17 Apr 2001
  • Regina (On the Application of Lowther) v Durham County Council and Another: CA 24 May 2001
  • Regina (Jet Services Ltd) v Civil Aviation Authority: CA 1 May 2001
  • Regina (Hirst) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 8 Mar 2001
  • Regeling v Bestuur Van De Bedrijfsverenging Voor De Metaalnijverheid: ECJ 20 Jul 1998
  • Thomas Reckley v Minister of Public Safety and Immigration and Others (Bahamas) (No 2): PC 6 Feb 1996
  • Re Palmer (A Deceased Debtor), Palmer v Palmer: CA 6 Apr 1994
  • Re Criminal Proceedings v Paul Corbeau (Civil Party: Regie Des Postes): ECJ 6 Sep 1993
  • Ramstead v The Queen: PC 2 Dec 1998
  • Sudershan Kumar Rampal v Surendra Rampal: CA 19 Jul 2001
  • Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd: CA 13 Apr 2001
  • Regina v O’Brien; Regina v Hall; Regina v Sherwood: CACD 16 Feb 2000
  • Regina v Sacupima and Others, Ex Parte Newham London Borough Council: QBD 26 Nov 1999
  • Regina v Ministry of Defence, Ex Parte Walker: CA 5 Feb 1999
  • Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd: CA 17 Oct 2000
  • Raffelsen Zentralbank Osterreich Ag v Five Star General Trading Llc and Others: CA 1 Mar 2001
  • Regina v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex Parte O; Leicester City Council, Ex Parte Bhikha: CA 7 Sep 2000
  • Regina v Tandridge District Council, ex parte Al-Fayed: QBD 27 Jan 1999
  • Regina v Social Security Commissioner, Ex Parte Chamberlain: QBD 7 Jul 2000
  • Regina v Shannon (Also Known As Alford): CACD 11 Oct 2000
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Ex Parte Eastaway: HL 8 Nov 2000
  • Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Savas: ECJ 23 May 2000
  • Regina v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport, and the Regions, Ex Parte International Air Transport Association: QBD 3 Jun 1999
  • Regina v Richmond London Borough Council, Ex Parte Watson; Regina v Manchester City Council, Ex Parte Stennett; etc: CA 28 Sep 2000
  • Regina v Richmond London Borough Council, Ex Parte Watson; Regina v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, Ex Parte Armstrong etc: Admn 15 Oct 1999
  • Regina v Northallerton Magistrates, ex parte Dove: QBD 17 Jun 1999
  • Regina v Liverpool Magistrates Court, Ex parte Abiaka: QBD 5 Mar 1999
  • Regina v Lincoln Coroner, Ex Parte Hay: Admn 19 Feb 1999
  • Regina v Hinks: HL 27 Oct 2000
  • Regina v Governor of Belmarsh Prison and Another, Ex Parte Gilligan; Regina v Governor of Exeter Prison and Another, Ex Parte Ellis: HL 1 Dec 1999
  • Regina v The General Medical Council, ex parte Arpad Toth, Dr David Jarman Interested Party: QBD 29 Jun 2000
  • Regina v Dimsey; Regina v Allen: CA 14 Jul 1999
  • Regina v Department of Health, Ex Parte Source Informatics Ltd: CA 21 Dec 1999
  • Regina v Department of Health, Ex Parte Source Informatics Ltd: Admn 28 May 1999
  • Regina v Common Professional Examination Board, Ex Parte Mealing-Mcclead: CA 19 Apr 2000
  • Regina v Central Criminal Court Ex Parte Bright; Regina v Same, Ex Parte Rusbridger: QBD 21 Jul 2000
  • Regina v Cairns: CACD 8 Mar 2000
  • Regina v Brixton Prison and Another, Ex Parte Burke: HL 16 Jun 2000
  • Regina v Bow Street Magistrates ex parte Government of the United States of America; In re Allison: HL 2 Sep 1999
  • Regina v Bow County Court, Ex Parte Pelling: CA 17 Dec 1999
  • Regina v Bow County Court Ex parte Pelling: QBD 8 Mar 1999

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.