Site icon swarb.co.uk

Dvorski v Croatia: ECHR 20 Oct 2015

Grand Chamber: ‘As the Court has already held in its previous judgments, the right set out in article 6.3(c) of the Convention is one element, among others, of the concept of a fair trial in criminal proceedings contained in article 6.1 (see Imbrioscia v Switzerland (1994) 17 EHRR 441, 24 November 1993, paras 36 and 37, Series A no 275, and Salduz v Turkey [GC], no 36391/02, [2008] ECHR 1542, para 50, ECHR 2008)’

Citations:

25703/11 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Grand Chamber)), [2015] ECHR 927, (2016) 63 EHRR 7

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Citing:

CitedDvorski v Croatia ECHR 28-Nov-2013
. .

Cited by:

CitedMaguire, Re Application for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) SC 21-Mar-2018
The appellant faced a criminal trial. He was granted legal aid for two counsel. He asked for two particular junior counsel, but the certificate required him to instruct leading counsel and a junior. He objected that this deprived him of the right to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights, Criminal Practice

Updated: 19 October 2022; Ref: scu.554347

Exit mobile version