Site icon swarb.co.uk

Duka v Duka: Admn 16 May 2003

‘When Parliament uses the expression ‘the appellant had no other legitimate purpose’, it means no more than it says: namely, that there is no good reason, no legitimate reason, for pursuing the claim, and that is because it is a bad claim, and if the Secretary of State’s view that it is a bad claim and thus there is no legitimate reason for pursuing it is correct, then he is entitled to certify.’

Judges:

Collins J

Citations:

[2003] EWHC 1262 (Admin)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedBalamurali, Sandhu v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 15-Dec-2003
The applicants challenged certificates from the respondent that their appeals were mere delaying tactice.
Held: The section aimed to grant specific rights of appeal, to ensure that all possible appeal issues were decided, and to prevent abuse. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 28 July 2022; Ref: scu.185333

Exit mobile version