EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Amendment
Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity
It is reasonably arguable that the Employment Judge overlooked the Claimant’s internal grievances when he held the delay in raising new discrimination claims made it inequitable to amend the claim form.
Further to Whyte v Lewisham similar observations on the raising of unfounded allegations of bias withdrawn at the appeal.
McMullen QC J
[2013] UKEAT 0517 – 12 – 0304
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Whyte v London Borough of Lewisham EAT 28-Feb-2013
EAT Unfair Dismissal : Compensation
No error of law in Employment Tribunal’s approach to compensation for unfair dismissal. Observations on the correct approach by the DWP to the prescribed element in . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 30 October 2021; Ref: scu.509324 br>