A notice to quit the agricultural land had been given in the name of the residuary beneficiary, not in the name of the executors in whom the reversion was still vested.
Held: The notice was invalid. The residuary beneficiary was not the equitable owner, having only the right to see that the estate was duly administered.
Citations:
[1992] 2 EGLR 64
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Stodday Land Ltd and Another v Pye ChD 7-Oct-2016
The agricultural landlord sold part of his land subject to the respondent’s tenancy to the appellant. Before the transfer was registered, notices to quit were served by both the landlord and his buyer. The tenant challenged both notices in the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.570352