The Employment Tribunal had decided that a Polkey discount was to be made. At a subsequent remedies and review hearing, the Tribunal allowed the appellant to re-open that issue and having heard evidence, the Tribunal altered the percentage Polkey discount in favour of the appellant.
Held: There was no suggestion in the original decision that either representative had any difficulty dealing with the issue of the Polkey discount. It was clear from the detailed reasons that the Tribunal had fully explored all the facts of the case relevant to the Polkey discount.
Judges:
His Honour Judge Ansell
Citations:
[2002] UKEAT 1303 – 01 – 2201
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – Williams v Ferrosan Ltd EAT 5-Mar-2004
Acting on guidance, the parties representatives and the tribunal had assumed that part of the award relating to loss of future earnings would not be taxable. The question now was whether the tribunal had power of its own motion to review its . .
Cited – Council of The City of Newcastle Upon Tyne v Marsden (Rev 1) EAT 23-Jan-2010
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Review
Claim under Disability Discrimination Act 1995 dismissed at PHR because Claimant not available to give evidence as to long-term effect of injury – Judge willing to offer . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202417
