The claimant had for many years operated a mobile cafe from a layby on land owned by the respondents. He had claimed title to it by adverse possession. He appealed against rejection of the claim, the court having found that his occupation had not been continuous.
Held: The evidence was clear and saitisfactory that he had not been in occupation of the land for the full period suggested. The appeal failed.
Judges:
Arden, McFalane LJJ, Sir Stephen Sedley
Citations:
[2012] EWCA Civ 1660
Links:
Statutes:
Limitation Act 1980 15, Land Registration Act 2002 9691)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Registered Land, Limitation
Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.467099