Appellants challenged the changes brought about to women’s pensions by the Pensions Acts 1995 and 2007 raising the ages from which pensions would be available.
Judges:
Sir Terence Etherton MR, Lord Justice Underhill and Lady Justice Rose
Citations:
[2020] EWCA Civ 1199, [2020] WLR(D) 507, [2020] HRLR 20, [2021] 3 All ER 115, [2021] ICR 236
Links:
Statutes:
Pensions Act 1995, Pensions Acts 2007, Pensions Acts 2011, Pensions Acts 2014
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – Delve and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Admn 3-Oct-2019
Claimants challenged the raising of the age at which women became entitled to a state pension.
Held: The Appellants’ judicial review claim was dismissed. . .
Cited by:
Cited – The Department for Communities v Cox CANI 3-Aug-2021
The claimant suffered a life limiting condition, but not so that her death could be reasonably expected within six months. She complained that the resulting unavailability of PIP and UC without assessment was discriminatory as opposed to those who . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Benefits
Updated: 15 April 2022; Ref: scu.653892