Site icon swarb.co.uk

Cude v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 7 Sep 2010

Income Tax – Appellant sub-postmaster receiving termination payment on closure of sub-post office – was this compensation solely for loss of capital outlay on purchase price of business and not in connection with loss of office as a subpostmaster – no – or compensation for loss of office for the purposes of s401 ITEPA subject to s403 ITEPA exemption and therefore employment income – yes – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2010] UKFTT 424 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Income Tax

Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.426567

Exit mobile version