Crystalmews Ltd (in Liquidation) v Metterick and others: ChD 25 Oct 2006

Freezing orders had been made in the course of winding up proceedings after the company was found to have been involved in VAT fraud. Applications were made for the committal of defendants for breach of the freezing orders.

Judges:

Lawrence Collins J

Citations:

[2006] EWHC 2653 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedShah v Patel and others CA 15-Aug-2008
The appellant had been committed after failing to file evidence with the registrar after, in the insolvency of the company, another director had filed false evidence to explain missing funds. However the order had required the documents to be filed . .
See AlsoCrystal Mews Ltd v Metterick and Others ChD 13-Nov-2006
The court considered the punishment on finding contempt proved for breach of a freezing order: ‘In contempt cases the object of the penalty is both to punish conduct in defiance of the court’s order as well as serving a coercive function by holding . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT, Contempt of Court

Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.245697