Site icon swarb.co.uk

Crumpton v Unifox Properties: CA 1992

The court was asked as to the right of a transferee of the reversion to forfeit a lease in the period before registration of the transfer. Staughton LJ said that since the transferee did not yet have a legal estate and the claim was based on the existence of a legal title for its validity, the claim failed.

Judges:

Staughton LJ

Citations:

[1992] 25 HLR 121

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedFerrishurst Ltd v Wallcite Ltd CA 30-Nov-1998
A person in actual occupation of registered land at time of transfer can enforce his rights against the transferee. A sub-underlessee in occupation of part could enforce an option to purchase against the freeholder acquiring intermediate registered . .
CitedScribes West Ltd v Relsa Anstalt and others CA 20-Dec-2004
The claimant challenged the forfeiture of its lease by a freeholder which had acquired the registered freehold title but had not yet registered its ownership. The second defendant had forfeited the lease by peacable re-entry for arrears of rent, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Registered Land

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.187689

Exit mobile version