Site icon swarb.co.uk

Crown Dilmun, Dilmun Investments Limited v Nicholas Sutton, Fulham River Projects Limited: ChD 1 Apr 2004

The judge had handed down a judgement relying upon undertakings given by the parties. Though there appeared a possibility that one party had breached that undertaking no further action was to be taken.

Judges:

Mr Justice Smith

Citations:

[2004] EWHC 821 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See alsoCrown Dilmun, Dilmun Investments Limited v Nicholas Sutton, Fulham River Projects Limited ChD 23-Jan-2004
There was a contract for the sale of Craven Cottage football stadium, conditional upon the grant of non-onerous planning permissions. It was claimed that the contract had been obtained by the defendant employee in breach of his fiduciary duties to . .

Cited by:

See alsoCrown Dilmun, Dilmun Investments Limited v Nicholas Sutton, Fulham River Projects Limited ChD 23-Jan-2004
There was a contract for the sale of Craven Cottage football stadium, conditional upon the grant of non-onerous planning permissions. It was claimed that the contract had been obtained by the defendant employee in breach of his fiduciary duties to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contempt of Court

Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.195626

Exit mobile version