EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Appearance/response
Striking-out/dismissal
Employment Tribunal Rules 4,8,33. ET3 response accepted. Claimant contended that response lodged on behalf of Respondent 1 (employer) only and not also Respondent 2 (HR Manager) and applied for default judgment to be issued against Respondent 2. Employment Judge declined to do so. Claimant appeal dismissed. Employment Judge entitled to treat ET3 as joint response but if not review of default judgment would be allowed.
Judges:
Peter Clark J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 0031 – 11 – 2402
Links:
Employment
Updated: 04 September 2022; Ref: scu.430830