EAT Redundancy – Protective award
Employees who were faced with redundancy obtained protective awards because of lack of consultation on the part of the employer. They continued to work and to receive salary during the protected period. The Employer’s contention that that their earnings during this period went to diminish the amount payable under the protective award could not be justified under S190(4) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0222 – 06 – 2012
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Securicor Omega Express Ltd v GMB (A Trade Union) EAT 7-Apr-2003
EAT The company decided to close two branches and make redundancies. They presented the closure itself as a fait accompli to the union representatives. The Tribunal found that this involved a failure to consult . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 09 July 2022; Ref: scu.247865