On application for statutory review of a planning decision in which the claimant was refused permission to proceed, the court was now asked whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in upholding as a practice that, in the context of such a refusal of permission, where two defendants and an interested party each incurred expense in preparing a separate acknowledgement of service and summary grounds for contesting the claim, each had a prima facie entitlement to its costs.
Lord Reed (President), Lord Hodge (Deputy President), Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows
[2021] UKSC 36
Bailii, Bailii Summary, Bailii Issues and Facts
England and Wales
Updated: 31 July 2021; Ref: scu.666311 br>