Cotton v James, Gent One, and C; 18 Jan 1829

References: [1829] EngR 296, (1829) 3 Car & P 505, (1829) 172 ER 522
Links: Commonlii
Ratio:
This case cites:

  • See Also – Cotton v James, Gent One & C (Commonlii, [1829] EngR 293, (1829) M & M 273, (1829) 173 ER 1157)
    In trespass for entering plaintiff’s dwelling-house and taking his goods on a plea justifying the trespass by proceedings under a commission of bankruptcy, and replication taking issue on the act of bankruptcy, the defendant is entitled to begn. . .

(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:

  • See Also – Cotton v James ((1830) 1 B & Ad 128, Commonlii, [1830] EngR 713, (1830) 1 B & Ad 128, (1830) 109 ER 735)
    The burden of proof can shift during the course of a trial. Silence in circumstances in which a party would be expected to answer might convert evidence into proof. . .
  • See Also – James, Gent, One &C, v Cotton (, Commonlii, [1831] EngR 127, (1831) 7 Bing 266, (1831) 131 ER 103)
    . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 13-Jul-16
Ref: 322164