Site icon swarb.co.uk

Commission v Netherlands C-144/99: ECJ 10 May 2001

ECJ Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Incomplete transposition of the directive into national law. As to the applicable principles in transposing Directives as fully effective in national law: ‘The Court has explained that . . the Member States must define a specific legal framework in the sector concerned which ensures that the national legal system complies with the provisions of the directive in question. The framework must be designed in such a way as to remove all doubt or ambiguity, not only as regards the content of the relevant national legislation and its compliance with the directive, but also as regards the authority of that legislation and its suitability as a basis for regulation of the sector . . Consequently, given that the Member State concerned is required to ensure the full and exact application of the provisions of any directive, it falls short of its obligations so long as it has not completely complied with [the directive], even if that [domestic] law has to a large extent already secured the objectives of the directive. Any rights conferred by [the] directive must be guaranteed full protection . . Regard must be had to the Court’s consistent concern to ensure that the existing national legislation leaves no doubt as to the effects of the directive upon the legal position of individuals. In the words of the Court, ‘it is particularly important, in order to satisfy the requirement for legal certainty, that individuals should have the benefit of a clear and precise legal situation enabling them to ascertain the full extent of their rights and, where appropriate, to rely on them before the national courts.”
C-144/99, [2001] EUECJ C-144/99, [2001] ECR I-3541
Bailii
Directive 93/13/EEC
European
Cited by:
CitedAlabaster v Barclays Bank Plc and Another CA 3-May-2005
The claimant sought increased maternity pay. Before beginning her maternity leave she had been awarded a pay increase, but it was not backdated so as to affect the period upon which the calculation of her average pay was based. The court made a . .
CitedOffice of Fair Trading v Abbey National Plc and seven Others ComC 24-Apr-2008
The Office sought a declaration that the respondent and other banks were subject to the provisions of the Regulations in their imposition of bank charges to customer accounts, and in particular as to the imposition of penalties or charges for the . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 August 2021; Ref: scu.162749 br>

Exit mobile version