Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Commission v Council (Rec 1989,P 3799,Summ Pub ) (Judgment): ECJ 16 Nov 1989

Citations:

C-11/88, [1989] EUECJ C-11/88

Links:

European

Updated: 23 May 2022; Ref: scu.134791

Posted on May 23, 2022May 23, 2022 by dlsPosted in European

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Bossi v Commission: ECJ 14 Feb 1989

Next Next post: Greece v Commission (Rec 1989,P 3711) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Nov 1989

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Dehaghani v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland: NIIT 31 Aug 2005
Montgomery v Cafe Creme Restaurant Ltd and others: NIIT 10 Jun 2005
O’Kane v Northland Early Years Centre Ltd and Another: NIIT 4 May 2005
McMahon v Kulus and others: NIIT 4 May 2005
Harkin v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: NIIT 9 May 2005
Hoy v Nash and Another: NIIT 13 Apr 2005
Shestopalova and Others v Russia: ECHR 17 Nov 2005
Vasilyeva v Russia: ECHR 17 Nov 2005
Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: SCIT 25 Oct 2005
Almdudler-Limonade v OHMI (Forme D’Une Bouteille De Limonade): ECFI 30 Nov 2005
Smallwood v Revenue and Customs: SCIT 3 Nov 2005
Shukla v Rajpuri: NIIT 30 Mar 2005
Loans.Co.UK Ltd v Abbeyway Contracts Ltd and Another: Nom 18 Feb 2004
Corporate Events Ltd v Oliis Ltd: Nom 20 Feb 2004
Powell v Turner: Nom 20 Jan 2004
Bernard, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another: Admn 8 Mar 2005
Jackson, Regina (on the Application Of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 26 Nov 2004
Excel Polymers Ltd v Achillesmark Ltd: QBD 28 Jul 2005
Magagnin v Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police: EAT 9 Mar 2005
Gate Gourmet London Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union and others: QBD 21 Aug 2005
Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs v Stork: QBD 3 Aug 2005
Berti v Steele Raymond (A Firm): CA 16 Nov 2001
Wilson v Bell: 1843
Glyn (T/A Priors Farm Equine Veterinary Surgery) v McGarel-Groves and others: QBD 23 Jul 2005
Customs and Excise v Sawyer and others: CA 7 Nov 2001
Arletech Ltd v Millard and others: CA 12 Nov 2001
Warren’s Application for Judicial Review: CA 22 Oct 2001
Shamash v Inland Revenue: CA 16 Oct 2001
Hormel Foods Corporation v Antilles Landscape Investments NV: ChD 24 Jan 2005
Commission v Sweden: ECJ 20 Oct 2005
Al-Hasan, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 16 Feb 2005
Okoya v Metropolitan Police Service: CA 13 Feb 2001
Davila-Puga, Regina (on the Application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal: CA 25 May 2001
Kwan, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 16 May 2001
Kutay v Jooyandeh: CA 1 May 2001
Re H (Children): CA 4 Nov 2002
Maile and Another v Hopwood: CA 22 Nov 2002
Lucas v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 18 Nov 2002
Crop Protection Association Ltd (CPA), Regina (on the Application Of) v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Another: CA 16 May 2001
Hannington v Mitie Cleaning (South East) Ltd and Another: CA 26 Nov 2002
Judes, Regina (on the Application Of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal: CA 14 May 2001
Lambert v Lambert: CA 25 Nov 2002
Wood v North Durham Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: CA 26 Apr 2001
De Crittenden v Bayliss: CA 21 May 2001
In re F and H (Children): CA 25 Nov 2002
Kymanywa v London Borough of Hackney: CA 1 Nov 2002
Mashoko v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 7 Nov 2002
K v Cheshire Burgess Chief Constable: CA 6 Nov 2002
Samson, Regina (on the Application of) v Epping Benefits Review Board: CA 4 Apr 2001
Larwood Holdings Ltd v Hammond Services Ltd: CA 17 May 2001

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.