Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio: 1983

(Australia) ‘it is necessary for the plaintiff who seeks relief to establish unconscionable conduct, namely that unconscientious advantage has been taken of his disabling condition or circumstances’ Deane J: ‘Unconscionable dealing looks to the conduct of the stronger party in attempting to enforce, or obtain the benefit of, a dealing with a person under a special disability in circumstances where it is not consistent with equity or good conscience that he should do so. The adverse circumstances which may constitute special disability for the purposes of the principles relating to relief against unconscionable conduct may take a wide variety of forms and are not susceptible to being comprehensively catalogued.’

Judges:

Mason J, Deane J

Citations:

(1983) 46 ALR 402

Cited by:

CitedPortman Building Society v Dusangh and Others CA 19-Apr-2000
The defendant sought to set aside an order for possession under a mortgage.
Held: Where a case was strong enough on its face in terms of conduct and terms, unconscionable conduct could be inferred if there was no explanation offered to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Commonwealth, Contract, Equity

Updated: 29 April 2022; Ref: scu.186685