Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Chief Constable of Lancashire v Wilson and Others: QBD 14 Jul 2015

The court was asked to consider the compatibility of provisions in the 2009 Act with Human Rights law, in determining the rights of the individual subject to orders.

Kerr J
[2015] EWHC 2763 (QB)
Bailii
Policing and Crime Act 2009

Police, Human Rights

Updated: 18 January 2022; Ref: scu.566578

Posted on January 18, 2022January 18, 2022 by dlsPosted in Human Rights, PoliceTagged Human Rights, Police

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Bundesverband Souvenir – Geschenke – Ehrenpreise v Euipo – Freistaat Bayern (Neuschwanstein) (Judgment) French Text: ECFI 5 Jul 2016
Next Next post: Mr Marc Ellison and Chief Constable of The Police Service of Scotland (Electronic Devices): SIC 20 May 2016

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,519)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (316)
  • Commercial (1,423)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,025)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,171)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (835)
  • Contract (6,114)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,550)
  • Crime (8,398)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,315)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,826)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,629)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,721)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,953)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (2,003)
  • Human Rights (19,659)
  • Immigration (56,354)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,624)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,044)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (1,771)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,657)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,064)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,758)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,906)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,759)
  • Transport (2,049)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • VM3 Ltd v Lonsdale Roosje: Nom 3 Sep 2018
  • WPH Group Ltd v Simpson: Nom 15 Aug 2018
  • Superdry Plc v Evans: Nom 28 Aug 2018
  • Linnaeus Group Ltd v Viljoen: Nom 12 Aug 2018
  • Fathom Financial Consulting Ltd v Forrester: Nom 7 Aug 2018
  • Woodbrasscom v 11 Denmark St: Nom 12 Jul 2018
  • South West Security Services Ltd v Fly Promotion: Nom 5 Jul 2018
  • Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Robbie: Nom 6 Jul 2018
  • Chernykh And Others v Russia: ECHR 20 Sep 2018
  • Annen v Germany (No 3): ECHR 20 Sep 2018
  • Browne v The Parole Board of England and Wales: CA 20 Sep 2018
  • Gulyan v Armenia: ECHR 20 Sep 2018
  • 96 Leytonstone Road E15 1TQ: Newham: London: FTTPC 9 Feb 2018
  • Annen v Germany (No 5): ECHR 20 Sep 2018
  • 49 Bristol Road E7 8HG: Newham: London: FTTPC 15 May 2018
  • 17B Kings Gardens NW6 4PU: Camden: London: FTTPC 6 Jul 2018
  • Flats At 55 Westbury Road E17 6RH: Waltham Forest: London: FTTPC 12 Jun 2018
  • Victoria Cross Pub Jack Cornwall Street E12 5NN: Newham: London: FTTPC 16 Apr 2018
  • 15A Melford Road E11 4PR: Waltham Forest: London: FTTPC 18 Apr 2018
  • in re Pergamon Press Ltd: CA 1971
  • Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council (Restrictive Measures Taken v Iran – Opinion): ECJ 13 Sep 2018
  • Mensing (Taxation – Opinion) French Text: ECJ 13 Sep 2018
  • Maniero (Equal Treatment of Persons Irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin – Education – Scholarships – Opinion): ECJ 11 Sep 2018
  • Fallimento Traghetti Del Mediterraneo (Competition – Opinion) French Text: ECJ 13 Sep 2018
  • Hein (Organisation of Working Time – Collective Agreement In The Construction Industry – Opinion): ECJ 5 Sep 2018
  • Kreyenhop and Kluge (Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff – Judgment) : ECJ 6 Sep 2018
  • The Minister for Justice and Equality and Commissioner of The Garda Siochana (A Rule Dividing Jurisdiction Between Two Bodies In Specific Cases On The Basis of The Nature of The Comp: ECJ 11 Sep 2018
  • Rs v Commission (Judgment) French Text: ECFI 12 Sep 2018
  • Gratis Ic Ve Dis Ticaret v Euipo (Gratis) (Intellectual, Industrial and Commercial Property – Order) French Text: ECFI 13 Sep 2018
  • Leifheit v Euipo (Position De Quatre Carres Verts Sur Une Balance) (Judgment) French Text : ECFI 13 Sep 2018
  • Healy v Commission (Judgment) French Text: ECFI 12 Sep 2018
  • Eduard Meier v Euipo – Calzaturificio Elisabet (Safari Club) (Eu Trade Mark – Judgment) : ECFI 13 Sep 2018
  • Primart v Euipo – Bolton Cile Espana (Primart Marek Lukasiewicz) (Indicateur – Judgment): ECFI 12 Sep 2018
  • Liberato (Opinion) French Text: ECJ 6 Sep 2018
  • Harms (Air Transport – Reimbursement of The Price of A Ticket In The Event of Cancellation of A Flight – Judgment): ECJ 12 Sep 2018
  • Denizbank v Council (Restrictive Measures Adopted In View of Russia’S Actions Destabilising The Situation In Ukraine – Judgment): ECFI 13 Sep 2018
  • Foshan Lihua Ceramic v Commission (Dumping – Imports of Ceramic Tiles Originating In China – Judgment): ECFI 11 Sep 2018
  • Attorney-General v Dean and Chapter of Ripon Cathedral: ChD 1945
  • Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey: 29 Jun 1992
  • Mitchell v WT Grant Company: 13 May 1974
  • De Geoffroy and Others v Parliament (Judgment) French Text: ECFI 12 Sep 2018
  • Sapundzhiev v Bulgaria: ECHR 6 Sep 2018
  • Basic Net v Euipo (Judgment) French Text: ECJ 6 Sep 2018
  • Tiramavia Srl And Others v The Republic Of Moldova: ECHR 4 Sep 2018
  • Almaz-Antey v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive Measures Adopted In View of Russia’S Actions Destabilising The Situation In Ukraine – Judgment): ECFI 13 Sep 2018
  • Alpenchalets Resorts (Special Vat Scheme for Travel Agents – Opinion): ECJ 5 Sep 2018
  • Candd Foods Acquisition (Opinion) French Text: ECJ 6 Sep 2018
  • Chefaro Ireland v Euipo – Laboratoires Mandl (Nuit Precieuse) (Eu Trade Mark – Judgment) : ECFI 12 Sep 2018
  • Lachiri v Belgium: ECHR 18 Sep 2018
  • Czech Republic v Commission (European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (Eagf) – Judgment): ECJ 6 Sep 2018

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.