The claimants challenged an order granting the defendants leave to appeal against judgment, saying that the application had been made without the required disclosure and with material inaccuracies.
Held: The court should not take the exceptional step of setting aside leave once given,
Judges:
Richards LJ
Citations:
[2011] EWCA Civ 1679
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Jolly v Jay and Another CA 7-Mar-2002
The applicant sought to appeal a refusal to grant him permission to renew an oral application for leave to appeal. The respondent had appeared at the initial unsuccessful application, and had been awarded costs although there appeared to be no . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Torts – Other, Litigation Practice
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.451336