Site icon swarb.co.uk

Chaplin v Smith: 1926

It is possible for a lessee to permit a company, in which he has an interest, to occupy the demised premises for the purpose of its business, without parting with possession of those premises to that company.

Citations:

[1926] 1 KB 198

Cited by:

CitedAkici v LR Butlin Ltd CA 2-Nov-2005
The tenant appealed against forfeiture of his lease for breach of a qualified covenant against assignment. It was said that the tenant had attempted to hide from the landlord the assignment of the premises to his company or its shared occupation. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.234410

Exit mobile version