Site icon swarb.co.uk

Chang-Tave v Haydon School and Another: EAT 2 Sep 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Postponement or stay
Striking-out/dismissal
Employment Tribunal wrong to refuse postponement application on medical grounds and further wrong to strike out the claims brought by the Claimant under ET rule 18(7)(c) on the basis of his failure to provide a witness statement when he had done so in compliance with the most recent ET Order (Blockbuster v James [2006] IRLR 630).

Citations:

[2010] UKEAT 0153 – 10 – 0209

Links:

Bailii

Employment

Updated: 25 August 2022; Ref: scu.425020

Exit mobile version