Site icon swarb.co.uk

Castro and Another v Secretary of State for The Home Department (Removals: S47 (As Amended)) Philipines: UTIAC 12 May 2014

UTIAC In s.47 of the 2006 Act as amended by s.51 of the 2013 Act, sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii) of subsection (1A)(a) refer to the application, not the decision.
A decision reported in the Notice of Decision in the form ‘the Secretary of State has decided that you should be removed’ is a decision of which notice under s.47 (as amended) may be given.
The amended s.47 is not drafted with reference to s.3C of the 1971 Act and is applicable where the decision refusing leave is made before the original leave expires, as well as where s.3C extends the applicant’s leave.
When an applicant has put forward a comprehensive case for extension of leave and the application has been refused, there need be no more reasons for the removal decision than those already expressed as motivating the refusal.

[2014] UKUT 234 (IAC)
Bailii
England and Wales

Immigration

Updated: 16 December 2021; Ref: scu.534242

Exit mobile version